MOLECULAR MARKER SYSTEMS AND THEIR UTILIZATION IN COMMON BEAN

NEERAJ CHOUDHARY¹*, REYAZUL ROUF MIR², ASHWANI KUMAR^3
1Division of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu, 180009, India
²Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Wadura Sopore, 193201
³School of Agriculture, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, 173229, Himachal Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : nirs.micro@gmail.com

Received : 19-07-2018     Accepted : 27-07-2018     Published : 30-07-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 7       Pages : 475 - 477
Genetics 10.7 (2018):475-477

Keywords : Common bean, QTLs
Academic Editor : Dr Deepak Kumar, Dr Nimit Kumar
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu, J&K, 180009, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 2n = 2x = 22) is the most important edible food legume. It represents 50% of the grain legumes consumed worldwide. Traits of economic importance need to be mined for crop improvement. Morphological characters were used to select and cross the plants carrying desired combination of traits to produce new cultivars during early 19th century as it was the only available option. However, there were some major shortcomings in using morphological characters viz, development stage specific expression, sensitivity to environmental conditions, alteration in expression by epistatic and pleiotropic interactions and identification of genomic regions (QTLs) controlling quantitative traits (QTs) through conventional phenotypic evaluation was very difficult. The discovery of molecular markers in the 1980s, which are based on polymorphism in DNA sequences, was a major breakthrough towards genetic characterization of quantitative traits. Molecular markers make it possible to track the inheritance of linked segments of the genome in suitable pedigrees and significant association between molecular markers.

1. Broughton W.J., Hernandez G., Blair M.W. and Beebe S. (2003) Plant Soil, 252, 55-128.
2. Gepts P. (1998) Hort Sci., 33, 1124-1130.
3. Mir R.R., Hiremath P.J., Riera-Lizarazu O. and Varshney R.K. (2013) Evolving molecular marker technologies in plants: From RFLPs to GBS. In: T. Lübberstedt and R.K. Varshney (eds.), Diagnostics in Plant Breeding. Springer Netherlands, pp. 229-247.
4. Mir R.R. and Varshney R.K. (2013) Future prospects of molecular markers in plants. In: Robert J. Henry (eds.), Molecular Markers in Plants. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 169-190
5. Phillips R.L. and Vasil I.K. (1994) Introduction: molecular marker maps of major crop species. In DNA-based markers in plants. Springer Netherlands, pp. 142-143.
6. Gupta P.K. and Varshney R.K. (2000) Euphytica, 113, 163-185.
7. Gupta P.K., Rustgi S. and Mir R.R. (2008) Heredity, 101, 5-18.
8. Schmutz J., McClean P.E., Mamidi S., Wu G.A., Cannon S.B., Grimwood J., Jenkins J., Shu S., Song Q., Chavarro C. and Torres-Torres M. (2014) Nature genet., 46, 707-713.
9. Santalla M., De Ron A.M. and De La Fuente M. (2010) Theor. Appl. Genet.,120, 1635-1651.
10. de Campos T., Oblessuc P.R., Sforça D.A., Cardoso J.M.K., Baroni R.M., de Sousa A.C.B., Carbonell S.A.M., Chioratto A.F., Garcia A.A.F., Rubiano L.B. and de Souza A.P. (2011) Mol. Breed., 27(4), 549-560.
11. Blair M.W., Diaz L.M., Buendia H.F. and Duque M.C. (2009) Theor. Appl. Genet., 119, 955-972.
12. Rossi M., Bitocchi E., Bellucci E., Nanni L., Rau D., Attene G. and Papa R. (2009) Evolutionary Applications, 2, 504-522.
13. Miklas P., Kelly J., Beebi S. and Blair M. (2006) Euphytica, 147, 105-131.
14. Shi C., Navabi A. and Yu K. (2011) BMC Plant Biol., 11, 52.
15. Chen W., Mingus J., Mammadov J., Backlund J.E., Greene T., Thompson S. and Kumpatla S. (2010) KASPar: a simple and cost-effective system for SNP genotyping. In: Plant and animal genomes 426 XVII conference, San Diego, USA, p 194.
16. Mitchell S.E., Kresovich S., Jester C.A., Hernandez C.J. and Szewc-McFadden A.K. (1997) Crop Sci., 37, 617-624.
17. Matus I.A. and Hayes P.M. (2002) Genome, 45, 1095-1106.
18. Beebe S., Gonzalez A.V. and Rengifo J. (2000) Food Nutrit. Bulletin, 21, 387-91.
19. Sustar-Vozlic J., Maras M., Javornik B. and Meglic V. (2006) J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 131, 242-249.
20. Gill-Langarica H.R., Muruaga-Martinez J.S., Vargas-Vázquez M.L., Rosales-Serna R. and Mayek-Perez N. (2011) Genet. Mol. Biol., 34, 595-605.
21. Beebe S., Pedraza F., Rojas M., Gutierrez J. and Tohme J. (1998) Annual Report ofthe Bean Improvement Cooperative, 41, 95-96.
22. Marotti L., Bonetti A., Minelli M., Catizone P. and Dinelli G. (2007) Genet. Resou. Crop Evol. 54, 175-188.
23. Sharma P.N., Diaz L.M. and Blair M.W. (2013)Plant Genet.Resou.,11, 121-130.
24. Perseguini J.M.K.C., Oblessuc P.R., Rosa J.R.B.F., Gomes K.A., Chiorato A.F., Carbonell S.A. M., Garcia A.A.F., Vianello R.P. and Benchimol-Reis L.L. (2016) PloS one, 11, e0150506.
25. Buah S., Buruchara R. and Okori P. (2017) Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1-14.
26. Burt A.J., William H.M., Perry G., Khanal R., Pauls K.P., Kelly J.D. and Navabi A. (2015) PloS one, 10, e0139450.
27. Gujaria-Verma N., Ramsay L., Sharpe A.G., Sanderson L.A., Debouck D.G., Taran B. and Bett K.E. (2016) BMC Genomi., 17(1), 239.
28. Dwivedi S.L., Crouch J.H., Mackill D.J., Xu Y., Blair M.W., Ragot M. et al., (2007) Adv. Agron., 95, 163-318.
29. Collard B.C. and Mackill D.J. (2008) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 363, 557-572.
30. IRGSP (2005) Nature, 436, 793-800.
31. Paterson A.H., Bowers J.E., Bruggmann R., Dubchak I., Grimwood J., Gundlach H. and Rokhsar D. S. (2009) Nature, 457(7229), 551-556.
32. Schnable P.S., Ware D., Fulton R.S., Stein J.C., Wei F., Pasternak S. and Cordes M. (2009) Science, 326(5956), 1112-1115.
33. Feuillet C., Leach J.E, Rogers J., Schnable P.S. and Eversole K. (2010) Trends Plant Sci., 16, 77-88.
34. IWGSC (2014) Science, 345, 1251788.
35. Varshney R.K., Song C., Saxena R.K., Azam S., Yu S., Sharpe A.G., Cannon S., Baek J., Rosen B.D., Taran B. and Millan T. (2013) Nature Biotechnol., 31(3), 240.
36. Yu J. and Buckler E.S. (2006) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.,17, 155-160.
37. Galeano C.H., Cortes A.J., Fernandez A.C., Soler A., Franco-Herrera N., Makunde G., Vanderleyden J. and Blair M.W. (2012) BMC Genet., 13, 48.
38. Nemli S., Asciogul T.K., Kaya H.B., Kahraman A., Eşiyok D. and Tanyolac B. (2014) J. Sci. Food Agricult., 94, 3141-3151.
39. Kamfwa K., Cichy K.A. and Kelly J.D. (2015) Theor. Appl. Genet., 128, 1999-2017.
40. Perseguini J.M.K.C., Oblessuc P.R., Rosa J.R.B.F., Gomes K.A., Chiorato A.F., Carbonell S.A. M., Garcia A.A.F., Vianello R.P. and Benchimol-Reis L.L. (2016) PloS one, 11, e0150506.
41. Choudhary N., Bawa V., Paliwal R., Singh B., Bhat M.A., Mir J.I., Gupta M., Sofi P.A., Thudi M., Varshney R.K. and Mir R.R. (2018) PloS one, 13(2), e0191700.
42. Moose S. and Mumm R.H. (2008) Plant Physiol., 147, 969-977.
43. Ribaut J.M., De Vicente M.C. and Delannay X. (2010) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 13, 213-218.
44. Singh S.P., Morales F.J., Miklas P.N. and Teran H. (2000) Crop Sci.,40, 1565-1572.
45. McMillan Jr R.T., Davis M.J., McLaughlin H.J. and Stavely J.R. (1998) Annu. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop., 31, 32.
46. Urrea C.A., Miklas P.N., Beaver J.S. and Riley R.H. (1996) J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 121, 1035-1039.
47. Ragagnin V.A., Alzate-Marin A.L., Souza T.L.P.O., Sanglard D.A. and Moreira M.A. (2005) Annu. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop., 48, 94-95.
48. Alzate-Marin A.L., Cervigni G.D.L., Moreira M.A. and Barros E.G. (2005)Fitopatologia Brasileira,30,333-342.
49. Costa M.R, Tanure J.P.M, Arruda K.M.A, Carneiro J.E.S. and Moreira M.A. (2006) Annu. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop., 49, 187-188.