GENETIC PARAMETERS AND ASSOCIATION STUDIES FOR YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAITS AMONG PARENTS AND ITS HYBRID IN RICE (Oryza sativa L)

G.C. OJHA¹, A.K. SARAWGI², N. OJHA³*
¹ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute Regional Station, Indore, 452001, Madhya Pradesh, India
²Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492 012, Chhattisgarh, India
³ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Seoni, 480661, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi VishwaVidyalaya, Krishinagar, Adhartal, Jabalpur 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : niharikas86@gmail.com

Received : 30-05-2018     Accepted : 07-06-2018     Published : 30-06-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 6       Pages : 438 - 442
Genetics 10.6 (2018):438-442

Keywords : Genetic variability, Correlation, Heritability, Hybrid rice and grain yield
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492 012, Chhattisgarh, India.
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

In existing experiment, eighteen crosses along with nine parents were evaluated for genetic parameter and association study for identification yield contributing traits. The analysis of variance was showed that the huge amount of variability is present between parents and their hybrids for all traits. The PCV is greater than GCV revealing the little influence the environment on character expression (ECV) for most of the traits except hundred grain weight (1.11) and grain yield (1.23). The high magnitudes of phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation were recorded for the traits viz., grain yield per plant (69.94% and 71.52%), effective tillers (68.15% and 68.36%), total tillers (58.08% and 58.86%) and flag leaf width (29.30% and 29.42%). The high value of heritability along with high genetic advance were recorded for days to 50% flowering, flag leaf length, plant height, effective tillers, grain yield, panicle length and flag leaf width. Generally, phenotypic correlations are found higher than corresponding phenotypic and environmental correlation owing to modified cause of environment traits by which associated at genetic level. Grain yield per plant exhibited highly significant and positively associated with tiller per plant at genotypic (0.599), phenotypic (0.606) and environmental (0.646) level, effective tiller per plant at genotypic (0.730), phenotypic (0.734) and environmental (0.824) level. Decorticated grain breadth was found positive and significant correlation at environmental (0.620) level at 1% level of probability. This indicates that the relative utility of these traits for selection with respect to grain yield.

1. Adhikari B., Bag M.K., Bowmick M.K. and Kundu C. (2012). https://www.rkmp.co.in, pp88.
2. Chakravorty A. and Ghosh P.D. (2013) Indian Journal Plant Genetic Resource, 26(1), 62-67.
3. Srijan A., Sudheer Kumar S., Damodar Raju Ch and Jagadeeshwar R. (2016) Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(1), 184 –190.
4. Das B., D. Murmu K., Ghimiray T. S., Karforma J., Kundu1 S. and Yonzone R. (2017) International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 6(1), 1587-1595.
5. Kempthorne O. (1957) John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
6. Chaisang K., Puniya B.W. and Balasubramanium K.M. (1967) Madrass Agriculture Journal, 54,118-123.
7. Burton G.W. (1952) Proceeding of sixth International Congress, 277-283.
8. Goswami A. (2018) International Journal of Plant Sciences, 13 (1), 188-191.
9. Sivasubramanian S. and Madhavamenon P. (1973) Madras Agriculture Journal, 60, 1093-1096.
10. Abebe T., Alamerew S. and Tulu L. (2017) Advances Crop Science Technology, 5, 272.
11. Paikhomba N., Kumar A., Chaurasia A.K., Rai P.K. (2013) Journal of Rice Research, 2, 117.
12. Aravind J., Kahani F. and Hittalmani S. (2015) Journal of Rice Research, 3, [13] Shahriar M.H. (2014) A Thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Bangladesh Agricultural University.
14. Johnson H.W., Robinson H.F. and Comstock R.E. (1955) Agronomy journal, 47, 314-318.
15. Rukmini K.D., Parimala K., Venkanna V., Lingaiah N., Hari Y. and Chandra B.S. (2016) International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 4(2), 250-255.
16. Anyaoha C., Adegbehingbe F., Uba U., Popoola B., Gracen V., Mande, S., Onotugoma E. and Fofana M. (2018) International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 22(5), 1-9.
17. Lingaiah N., Sarla N., Radhika K., Venkanna V., Vishnu Vardhan Reddy D. and Surender Raju (2018) International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10(9), 5956-5957.
18. Fentie D., Alemayehu G., Siddalingaiah M. and Tadesse T. (2014) East African Journal of Science, 8, 147-154.
19. Roy R. K., Ranimajumder R., Sultana S., Mehoque and Ali Ms (2015). Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 44(4), 529-535.
20. Idris A.E., and, Mohamed K.A. (2013) Global Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 3, 1-6.
21. Mamata K., Rajanna M.P. and S.K. Savita (2018) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 2210-2217.
22. Sao F.C., Sarawgi A.K., Sao M.K., Yadav S.K. and Markam N.K. (2013) Current Advances of Agricultural Sciences, 5(2), 259-262.
23. Harsha, Deo I., Kumar S. and Talha M. (2017) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(9), 2041-2046.
24. Naseem I, Khan A.S. and Akhtar (2014) International Journal of scientific and Research Publication, 4(4), 1-5.
25. Hasan M.J., Kulsum M.U., Aktar A., Masuduzzaman A.S.M. and Ramesha M.S. (2011) Bangladesh Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 24 (1), 45-51.
26. Nirmaladevi G., Padmavathi G., Suneetha Kota and Babu V. R. (2014) SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 47 (4), 424-433.
27. Zahid H.A., Akhtar M., Sabar M., Manzoor Z. and Awan T. (2006) Asian Journal of Plant Science, 5(4), 643-645.
28. Sarawgi A.K., Rastogi N.K. and Soni D.K. (1997) Field Crop Research, 52, 161-167.
29. Ekka R.E., Sarawgi, A.K. and Kanwar R.R. (2011) Journal of Rice Research, 4, 1-2.
30. Satheeshkumar P. and Saravanan K. (2012) International Journal of Current Research, 4, 082-085.