ISSN : 0975-5276
EISSN : 0975-9174
N.C. GUPTA1*, MAHESH RAO2, PANKAJ SHARMA3
1ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, Pusa, New Delhi, Delhi 110012, India
2ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, Pusa, New Delhi, Delhi 110012, India
3ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, Sewar, Bharatpur, 321303, Rajasthan, India
* Corresponding Author : navinbtc@gmail.com
Received : 17-04-2018 Accepted : 24-04-2018 Published : 30-04-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 4 Pages : 1166 - 1170
Int J Microbiol Res 10.4 (2018):1166-1170
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.4.1166-1170
Keywords : Sclerotinia, Stem rot, Oilseed, Oxalic acid, Anti-microbial peptides
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : The authors are grateful to Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India and ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology for providing the financial support and facilities to conduct the research work on Stem rot disease in oilseed crop
Author Contribution : NCG and PS conceived the project and obtained funding from ICAR-EMR project for Sclerotinia work in Indian mustard. NCG and MR wrote the manuscript and PS has edited the manuscript
The pathogens aggression with endless evolutionary pressure refines their molecular strategies to achieve the successful pathogenesis. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib) de Bary, a necrotrophic phytopathogen is ubiquitously distributed worldwide and affecting the large number of host species. Several control measures like fungicides application, cultural practices, crop rotation are the usual practices available to the farmers are in use. But, despite its success, these processes are quite expensive and indistinctness of fungicides doses and time of application are the major hurdle in their routine use. Although, partial resistance/tolerance has already been reported in B. napus and B. carinata but not a single source in B. juncea, which hinders the resistance breeding program. However, the recent advancement in biotechnological interventions are observed more promising in developing the alternatives like fungal growth inhibition, defense response activation, detoxification of the virulence factors, and RNAi or HIGS for engineered resistance to the Sclerotinia stem rot disease
1. FAOSTAT (2016) Accessed March 2016.
2. Campbell M.A., Fitzgerald H.A., Ronald P.C. (2002) Transgenic Res. 11, 599-613.
3. Durante M., Vannozzi G.P., Pugliesi C., Bernardi R. (2002) Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Sunflower Biotechnology, San Giuliana Terme, Pisa, Italy, 25, 1-28.
4. Bolton M.D., Thomma B.P., Nelson B.D. (2006) Molecular Plant Pathology, 7, 1-16.
5. Khangura R., Beard C. (2015) Australian Government.
6. Purdy L.H. (1979) Phytopathology, 69, 875-80.
7. Bardin S.D., Huang H.C., (2001) Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 23, 88-98.
8. Jones D., Gray E.G. (1973) Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 60, 495-500.
9. Jamaux I., Gelie B., Lamarque C. (1995) Plant Pathology, 44, 22-30.
10. Bom M., Boland G.J. (2000) Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80, 889-98.
11. Clarkson J.P., Phelps K., Whipps J.A., Young C.S., Smith J.A., Watling M. (2007) Phytopathology, 97, 621-31.
12. Garg H., Li H., Sivasithamparam K., Kuo J., Barbetti M.J. (2010c) Annals of Botany, 106, 897-908.
13. Hegedus D.D., Rimmer S.R. (2005) FEMS Microbiology Letters, 251, 177-84.
14. Derbyshire, M.C., Denton-giles, M. (2016) Plant pathology, 65, 859-77.
15. Maxwell D.P., Lumsden R.D. (1970) Phytopathology, 60,1395-98.
16. Noyes R.D., Hancock J.G. (1981) Physiological Plant Pathology, 18, 123-32.
17. Marciano P., Dilenna P., Magro P. (1983) Physiological Plant Pathology, 22, 339-45.
18. Magro P., Marciano P., Dilenna P. (1984) FEMS Microbiology Letters, 24, 9-12.
19. Tu J.C. (1985) Physiological Plant Pathology, 26, 111-7.
20. Godoy G., Steadman J.R., Dickman M.B., Dam R. (1990) Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 37, 179-191.
21. Thompson C., Dunwell J.M., Johnstone C.E., et al., (1995) Euphytica, 85, 169-72.
22. Dong X.B., Ji R.Q., Guo X.L. et al., (2008) Planta, 228, 331-40.
23. Lu G., Bidney D., Bao Z., Hu X., Wang J., Vortherms T., Scelonge C., Wang L., Bruce W., Duvick J. (2000) The Proceedings of 15th International Sunflower Conference. Toulouse, France, June 2000, K72-7.
24. Scelonge C., Wang L., Bidney D., Lu G., Hastings C., Cole G., Mancl M., D’Hautefeuille J.-L., Sosa-Dominguez G., Coughlan S. (2000) The Proceedings of 15th International Sunflower Conference. Toulouse, France. June 2000, K66-71.
25. Hu X., Bidney D.L., Yalpani N. et al., (2003) Plant Physiology, 133, 170-81.
26. Walz A., Zingen-Sell I., Loeffler M., Sauer M. (2008) Plant Pathology, 57, 453-8.
27. Donaldson P.A., Anderson T., Lane B.G., Davidson A.L., Simmonds D.H. (2001) Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 59, 297-307.
28. Calla B., Blahut-Beatty L., Koziol L. et al., (2014) Molecular Plant Pathology, 15, 563-75.
29. Lane B.G., Dunwell J.M., Ray J.A., Schmitt M.R., Cuming A.C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268,12239-42.
30. Kotsira V.P., Clonis Y.D. (1997) Arch Biochem. Biophys. 340, 239-49.
31. Dunwell J.M. (1998) Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews, 15, 1-32.
32. Davidson R.M., Reeves P.A., Manosalva P.M., Leach J.E. (2009) Plant Science, 177, 499-510.
33. Hill A., (1937) Economic Botany. New York, USA, McGraw-Hill.
34. Dunwell J.M., Khuri S., Gane P.J. (2000) Microbiol. Mol. Biol., Rev, 64, 153-79.
35. Lane B.G. (2000) Biochem. J., 349, 309-321.
36. Escutia M.R., Bowater L., Edwards A. et al., (2005) Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 3608–16.
37. Dumas B., Cheviet J.P., Sailland A., Freyssinet G. (1993) In: Fritig BM, Legrand M, eds. Mechanisms of Plant Defense Responses. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 451.
38. Dumas B., Freyssinet G., Pallett K.E. (1995) Plant Physiology, 107, 1091-6.
39. Liang H., Maynard C.A., Allen R.D., Powell W.A. (2001) Plant Mol. Biol. 45, 619-629.
40. Ramputh A.I., Arnason J.T., Cass L., Simmonds J.A. (2002) Plant Sci., 162, 431-440.
41. Ganz T. (2003) Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43, 300-4.
42. Rao, A.G. (1995) Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 8, 6-13.
43. Broekaert W.F., Cammue B.P.A., DeBolle M.F.C., Thevissen K., DeSamblanx G.W., Osborn R.W. (1997) Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 16, 297-323.
44. Verma S.S., Yajima W.R., Rahman M.H. et al., (2012) Plant Molecular Biology, 79, 61-74.
45. Rustagi A., Kumar D., Shekhar S., Yusuf M.A., Misra S., Sarin N.B. (2014) Molecular Biotechnology, 56, 535-45.
46. Garcia-Olmedo F., Molina A., Segura A., Moreno M. (1995) Trends in Microbiology, 3, 72-4.
47. Fan Y., Du K., Gao Y. et al., (2013) Russian Journal of Genetics, 49, 380-7.
48. Jiang Y.Z., Fu X.L., Wen M.L. et al., (2013b) Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 82, 81-7.
49. Grison R., Grezes-Besset B., Schneider M. et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology, 14, 643-6.
50. Solgi T., Moradyar M., Zamani M.R., Motallebi M. (2015) Plant Protection Science, 51, 6-12.
51. Deller S., Hammond-Kosack K.E., Rudd J.J. (2011) Journal of Plant Physiology, 168, 63-71.
52. Dickman M.B., Park Y.K., Oltersdorf T., Li W., Clemente T., French R. (2001) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 6957-62.
53. Koch A., Kogel K.H. (2014) Plant Biotechnology Journal, 12, 821-31.
54. Andrade C.M., Tinoco M.L.P., Rieth A.F., Maia F.C.O., Arag~ao F.J.L. (2015) Plant Pathology, doi: 10.1111/ppa.12447.
55. Koch A., Kumar N., Weber L., Keller H., Imani J., Kogel K.H. (2013) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 19324-9.