B. Uma Reddy1*
1Department of Bioinformatics, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India
* Corresponding Author : drumareddy11@yahoo.co.in
Received : - Accepted : - Published : 21-12-2009
Volume : 1 Issue : 2 Pages : 47 - 53
Int J Bioinformatics Res 1.2 (2009):47-53
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-3087.1.2.47-53
Keywords : matK gene, polyphyletic, Cucurbitaceae, Phylogenetic relationships, MEGA
Conflict of Interest : None declared
MaturaseK gene (matK) of chloroplast is highly conserved in plant systematics which is involved in Group-II intron splicing. The size of the gene is approximately 1500 base pairs in length, located with in the intron of trnK. In the present study, matK gene from Cucurbitaceae was taken for the analysis of variants, parsimony site, patterns, transition/ transversion rate and phylogeny. The family Cucurbitaceae comprises over 120 genera and 825 species with medicinal values. The matK gene sequences have been withdrawn from GenBank and used for the analysis. The multiple sequence alignments were performed by Genebee-ClustalW. The phylogenetic analyses were carried out by MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) software package based on Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) methods. The results indicated that the Trichosanthes, Austrobryonia, Momordica, Neoalsomitra, Gomphogyne, Sicyos genera showed polyphyletic condition. The overall invariants between the 88 taxa are 28.5%, average composition of nucleotides among taxa are found to be approximately, A-0.30, T-0.37, G-0.15, C-0.17 and the ratio of transition and transversion is 0.824. Phylogenetic tree was designed to identify the ideal regions that could be used for defining the inter and intra-generic relationships. From this study, it could be concluded that, the chloroplast matK gene sequences can unambiguously resolve the relationships, as well as provided a good indication of major supra-generic groupings among the selected members of the family Cucurbitaceae.
[1] Wolfe K.H. (1991) Protein – coding genes in
chloroplast DNA: compilation of
nucleotide sequences, data base entries
and rates of molecular evolution. In
K.Vasil [ed.], Cell culture and somatic
cell genetics of plants, 7 BI, Academic
Press, San Diego, California, USA, 467-
482.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[2] Wolfe K.H., Morden C.W. and Palmer J.D.
(1992) Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA, 89,
10648 -10652
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[3] Cao H., Sasaki Y., Fushimi H. and Komatsu
K. (2001) Biol Pharm Bull, 24, 1389-
1394
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[4] Zhu S., Fushimi H., Cai S. and Komatsu K.
(2003) Planta Med, 69, 647 – 653
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[5] Cameron K.M., Chase M.W., Anderson
W.R. and Hillis H.G. (2001) Am J Bot,
88, 1847-1862
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[6] Liang H.P. and Hilu K.W. (1996) Can J Bot,
74, 125 – 134.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[7] Xiang Q.Y., Soltis D.E. and Soltis, P.S.
(1998) Am J Bot, 85, 285-297.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[8] Goldman D.H., Freudenstein J.V., Kores
P.J., Molvray M., Jarrell D.C., Whitten
W.M., Cameron K.M., Jansen R.K. and
Chase M.W. (2001) Syst Bot, 26, 670-
695
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[9] Salazar G.A., Chase M.W., Arenas M.A.S.
and Ingrouille M. (2003). Am J Bot, 90,
777-795.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[10] Mabberley D.I. (1987) The Plant Book.
Cam. Univ Press, Cambridge, New
York
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[11] Uma Reddy B. (2009) Int J Bioinf, ISSN:
0974 – 6439, 2(1), 54- 59.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[12] Sudhir Kumar., Masatoshi Nei., Joel
Dudley. and Koichiro Tamura. (2008)
Brief in Bioinf, 9(4), 299-308
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[13] Kluge A.G. and Farris J.S. (1969) Syst Bot,
18, 1-22
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[14] Farris J.S. (1989) Cladistics, 5, 417 – 419
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[15] Felsenstein J. (1985) Evolution, 39, 783 -
791.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[16] Kenneth Cameron M., Mark Chase W.,
Mark Whitten W., Paul Kores J., David
Jarrell C., Victor Albert A., Tomosia
Yukawa., Harold Hillis G. and Douglas
Goldman H. (1999) Am J Bot, 86(2),
208 – 224
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[17] Kimura M. (1980) J Mol Evol, 16, 111-120.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[18] Jeffrey C. (1990) Systematics of
Cucurbitaceae: an overview. In D.M.
Bates, R.W. Robinson and C. Jeffrey
(eds.), Biology and utilization of the
Cucurbitaceae, , Cornell University
Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 3-9
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[19] Vasishta P.C. (2001) Taxonomy of
Angiosperms. Published by G.S.
Sharma, Proprietor, R. Chand and
Company, 1 – Ansari Road, Daryaganj,
New Delhi, 32
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[20] Sugita M. and Shinozaki K. (1985) Proc
Natl Acad Sci, USA, 82, 3557 – 3561
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus