RESPONSE OF POTASH MOBILIZING PGPR CONSORTIUM WITH GRADED DOSE OF POTASH IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.)

A.S. PATEL1*, H.N. SHELAT2, R.V. VYAS3
1Department of Agricultural Microbiology, B A College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
2Department of Agricultural Microbiology, B A College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
3Department of Agricultural Microbiology, B A College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
* Corresponding Author : aspatel1990@yahoo.in

Received : 05-09-2022     Accepted : 27-09-2022     Published : 30-09-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 9       Pages : 11669 - 11673
Int J Agr Sci 14.9 (2022):11669-11673

Keywords : Acinetobacter, Consortium, KMB, Maize, Potash
Academic Editor : V N Shiyal
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Main Maize Research Station, Godhra, 389001, Gujarat, India. Authors are also thankful to Department of Agricultural Microbiology, B A College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, Gujarat, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : PATEL, A.S., et al "RESPONSE OF POTASH MOBILIZING PGPR CONSORTIUM WITH GRADED DOSE OF POTASH IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.9 (2022):11669-11673.

Cite - APA : PATEL, A.S., SHELAT, H.N., VYAS, R.V. (2022). RESPONSE OF POTASH MOBILIZING PGPR CONSORTIUM WITH GRADED DOSE OF POTASH IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (9), 11669-11673.

Cite - Chicago : PATEL, A.S., H.N. SHELAT, and R.V. VYAS. "RESPONSE OF POTASH MOBILIZING PGPR CONSORTIUM WITH GRADED DOSE OF POTASH IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 9 (2022):11669-11673.

Copyright : © 2022, A.S. PATEL, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

To explore plant growth promoting abilities of native rhizospheric potash mobilizing bacterial (KMB) consortium with/without graded doses of potash in maize. A liquid potash mobilizing PGPR consortium was developed and its efficacy on maize was ascertained through field experiments at Main Maize Research Station, Godhra, Panchmahals, India during two consecutive seasons kharif and rabi in Randomized Block Design (factorial) with three replications. Based on PGP traits and tolerance tests five selected Acinetobacter potash mobilizing PGPR strains were screened for compatibility with each other showing high viable cell count in GYC broth. Overall results obtained from the field experimentation, it is concluded that the highest yield and yield attributing parameters of maize were recorded in treatment receiving KMB consortium @ 5 ml/kg seed along with soil application of 100% recommended dose of potash fertilizer (RDFK). The treatment receiving KMB consortium @ 5 ml/kg seed along with 75% RDFK was found at par with 100% RDFK suggesting possible saving of 25% RDFK. An innovative potash mobilizing PGPR consortium based on Acinetobacter strains developed and when applied @ 5ml/kg seed along with potash fertilizers enhanced growth and yield of maize - a promising life sustaining food and fodder crop

References

1. Rehm G. and Schmitt M. (2002) Potassium for crop production. University of Minnesota.
2. Bahadur I., Meena V.S., Kumar S. (2014) Int Res J Biological Sci., 3(12), 80-85.
3. Saha M., Maurya B.R., Bahadur I., Kumar A., Meena V.S. (2016) In Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. (pp. 127-136). Springer, New Delhi.
4. Muentz A. (1890) CR Acad Sci., 110, 1370-1372.
5. Meena V.S., Maurya B.R., Bahadur I. (2014a) Bangladesh J Bot., 43(2), 235-237.
6. Kumar A., Bahadur I., Maurya B.R., Raghuwanshi R., Meena V.S., Singh D.K., Dixit J. (2015) J Pure Appl Microbiol., 9(1), 715-724.
7. Meena R.K., Singh R.K., Singh N.P., Meena S.K., Meena V.S. (2015a) Biocatal Agric Biotechnol., 4(4), 806-811.
8. Singh N.P., Singh R.K., Meena V.S., Meena R.K. (2015) Vegetos., 28(1), 86-99.
9. Meena V.S., Maurya B.R., Verma J.P., Aeron A., Kumar A., Kim K., Bajpai V.K. (2015b) Ecol Eng., 81, 340-347.
10. Aleksandrov V.G. (1958) Dokl Akad Nauk., 7, 43–48.
11. Meena V.S., Maurya B.R., Verma J.P. (2014b) Microbiol Res., 169, 337-347.
12. Pindi P. and Satyanarayana S.D.V. (2012) J Biofertil Biopestici., 3, 4.
13. Sateesh G. and Sivasakthivelan P. (2013) Int J Chem Tech Res., 5, 1326-1328.
14. Haque A.H.M.M., Akon M.A.H., Islam M.A., Khalequzzaman K.M., Ali M.A. (2007) Int J Sustain Crop Prod., 2(5), 34-39.
15. Wu S.C., Cao Z.H., Li Z.G., Cheung K.C., Wong M.H. (2005) Geoderma., 125, 155–166.
16. Archana D.S., Nandish M.S., Savalagi V.P., Alagawadi A.R. (2012) Bioinfolet, 9(4), 627–630.
17. Iqbal A. and Hidayat Z. (2016) Sci Rep., 6, 34627.
18. Abou-el-Seoud, I.I. and Abdel-Megeed, A. (2012) Saudi J Biol Sci., 19(1), 55-63.
19. Singh G., Biswas D.R., Marwah T.S. (2010) J Plant Nutr., 33, 1236–1251.