VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF TAPIOCA IN SALEM DISTRICT OF TAMIL NADU

M. KOWSIKA1*, N. DEEPA2, S. SENTHILNATHAN3, R. GANGAI SELVI4
1Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
2Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
3Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam, 628252, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
4Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
* Corresponding Author : kowsikamanogaran@gmail.com

Received : 04-07-2022     Accepted : 27-07-2022     Published : 30-07-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 7       Pages : 11472 - 11474
Int J Agr Sci 14.7 (2022):11472-11474

Keywords : Tapioca value chain, Constraints, Price fluctuation, Labor unavailability
Academic Editor : C. Partheeban, Jothiprakash Gitanjali, Ankures Bhattacharya
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agricultural Rural Management (CARDS), Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : KOWSIKA, M., et al "VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF TAPIOCA IN SALEM DISTRICT OF TAMIL NADU." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.7 (2022):11472-11474.

Cite - APA : KOWSIKA, M., DEEPA, N., SENTHILNATHAN, S., GANGAI SELVI, R. (2022). VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF TAPIOCA IN SALEM DISTRICT OF TAMIL NADU. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (7), 11472-11474.

Cite - Chicago : KOWSIKA, M., N. DEEPA, S. SENTHILNATHAN, and R. GANGAI SELVI. "VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF TAPIOCA IN SALEM DISTRICT OF TAMIL NADU." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 7 (2022):11472-11474.

Copyright : © 2022, M. KOWSIKA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

It is important to assess the whole range of operations needed to move fresh tubers through various phases of production, processing, and marketing until it reaches the consumer in order to avoid post-harvest losses and promote the development of tapioca. This study investigates the problems faced by various actors in tapioca value chain such as farmers, commission agents and processors. In this study, 120 responses were taken from the farmers, 10 responses from commission agents and 5 responses from Sago industries of Salem district in Tamil Nadu as it is one of the major tapioca producing areas. The analysis methods in this study included percentage analysis and Garrett Ranking. The study found that price fluctuation was the major constraint faced by farmers in tapioca farming. It also found that the constraint faced by commission agent was shortage of labor availability and higher transportation cost was the major constraint faced by sago industries. Furthermore, this study made some suggestions to overcome these constraints

References

1. Horticultural Statistics at a Glance (2021) Horticulture Statistics Division Department of Agriculture Cooperation & Farmers’ Welfare Ministry Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Government of India.
2. Bamman H. (2007) Pacific Economic Bulletin, 22(3), 23-49.
3. Garrett H.E. (1966) Statistics in Psychology and Education, David McKay Company Inc., New York, 392-396.
4. Anand and Ramesh, H. D. (2007) Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 37(6), 45-50.
5. Anania G. (2011) Implications of trade policy changes for the competitiveness of Ecuadorian banana exports to the EU market (No. 10). Issue Paper: ICTSD EPAs and Regionalism Programme
6. Census of India (2011) District Census Handbook. edited by Directorate of Census Operations Tamil Nadu.
7. Huffman W. (2001) Human capital: Education and agriculture. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 1, 333-382
8. Jadav K.S., Jena A.K. and Darji V.B. (2011) Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 45(4), 266-274.
9. Jaffer A.M. and Namasivayam N. (2005) Indian Journal of Marketing, 35(5).
10. Khunt K.A. (2001) Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 15(1), 47-54.
11. Kohls R.L. and Uhl J.N. (1980) Marketing of agricultural products. MacMillan Publishing Co. Inc., New York, 22(109), 589-595.
12. Narula S.A. (2011) Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1(2), 15-21.
13. Odemero A.F. (2013) Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 3(1), 1-7.
14. Ramli S., Alkarkhi A.F., Shin-Yong Y., Min-Tze L. and Easa A.M. (2009) International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 60(4), 326-340.
15. Rangasamy N. and Dhaka J.P. (2008) Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21(2), 235-242.