STUDY ON VARIABILITY AND RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE STRAWBERRY (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) GENOTYPES GROWN UNDER HIGH HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND

NIDHIKA THAKUR1, ASHOK CHHETRI2*
1Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, 210001, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, 791102, Arunachal Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : chhetriash@gmail.com

Received : 02-02-2019     Accepted : 12-02-2019     Published : 15-02-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 3       Pages : 7857 - 7860
Int J Agr Sci 11.3 (2019):7857-7860

Keywords : Correlation, Path analysis, Strawberry, Variability
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to College of Horticulture, VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Bharsar, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. Authors are also thankful to College of Horticulture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, 210001, Uttar Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : THAKUR, NIDHIKA and CHHETRI, ASHOK "STUDY ON VARIABILITY AND RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE STRAWBERRY (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) GENOTYPES GROWN UNDER HIGH HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.3 (2019):7857-7860.

Cite - APA : THAKUR, NIDHIKA, CHHETRI, ASHOK (2019). STUDY ON VARIABILITY AND RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE STRAWBERRY (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) GENOTYPES GROWN UNDER HIGH HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (3), 7857-7860.

Cite - Chicago : THAKUR, NIDHIKA and ASHOK, CHHETRI. "STUDY ON VARIABILITY AND RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE STRAWBERRY (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) GENOTYPES GROWN UNDER HIGH HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 3 (2019):7857-7860.

Copyright : © 2019, NIDHIKA THAKUR and ASHOK CHHETRI, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) genotypes were evaluated to study variability, correlation and path analysis. Nineteen genotypes were planted using randomized complete block design with three replications during 2013-14. Fruit yield per plant had the highest PCV (56.25) and GCV (45.92). Highest heritability (H2, 73.10) was recorded for number of fruits per plant. Highest genetic advance (35.69) coupled with higher genetic gain (77.23 %) was estimated for fruit yield per plant. Fruit yield was significantly and positively associated with fruit length, fruit breadth, number of fruits per plant and average berry weight at both genotypic and phenotypic levels. Path coefficient analysis revealed that plant height had maximum positive direct effect (0.041) whereas average berry weight had maximum negative direct effect (-0.040) on fruit yield.

References

1. Sharma R.R. (2002) International Book Distributing Co., Lucknow.
2. Sharma R.M. and Yamdagni R. (2000) Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
3. Folta K.M. and Davis T.M. (2006) Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 25, 399- 415.
4. Mitra S.K. (1991) Horticulture and Allied publishers, Calcutta, 549-596.
5. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1983) John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York. pp. 357-427.
6. Burton G.W. and De vane E.W. (1953) Proejtunniens, 9 (22), 12-15.
7. Sivasubranian S. and Menon M. (1973) Madras Agricultural Journal, 60, 1139-1144.
8. Allard R.W. (1960) John Wiley and sons, New York, 485p.
9. Robinson H.F., Comstock R.E. and Harvey P.H. (1949) Agronomy Journal, 41(8), 353–359.
10. Johanson H.W., Robinson H.F. and Comstock R.E. (1955) Agronomy Journal, 47, 314-318.
11. Al-Jibouri H.W., Miller P.A. and Robinson H.F. (1958) Agronomy Journal, 50, 633-636.
12. Dewey J.R. and Lu K.H. (1959) Agronomy Journal, 51, 515-518.
13. Ara T., Haydar A., Mahmud H., Khalequzzaman K.M. and Hossain M.M. (2009) International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production, 4(5),15-18.
14. Suman D.K. (2000) M.Sc. Thesis, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, H.P., India.
15. Kumar B., Kumar S. and Yadav Y.C. (2012) HortFlora Research Spectrum, 1(1), 86-88.
16. Verma S.K., Singh R.K. and Arya R.R. (2002) Indian Journal of Horticulture, 59(1), 39-43.
17. Mishra P.K., Ram R.B. and Kumar N. (2015) Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39, 451-458.
18. Burton G.W. (1952) In, Proceedings of the 6th International Grassland Congress. State College, PA, USA, Pennsylvania State College, 1952, pp. 277–283.
19. Kumar R., Kumar S., Singh A.K. (2012) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82, 535–537.
20. Sah S., Sharma G. and Sharma N. (2010) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80, 576–883.
21. Karim R. (2008) M. Sc. Thesis, Department of Botany, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
22. Mir M.M., Neelofar and Bisati I.A. (2009) Advances in Plant Sciences, 22, 269–271.
23. Sharma G. and Sharma O.C. (2006) The Horticulture Journal, 19(1), 1-4.
24. Rao V.K., Lal B., Yadav V.K. and Sharma S.K. (2010) Journal of Hill Agriculture, 1(2), 179-182.
25. Hortynski J.A. (1989) Acta Horticulturae, 265, 169-173.
26. Das A.K., Singh B. and Sahoo R.K. (2006) Indian Journal of Horticulture, 63(1),83-85.
27. Singh S.R., Sundouri A.S., Sharma M.K. and Srivastva K.K. (2010) Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 23(2), 239-242.
28. Lal S.D. and Seth J.N. (1981) Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 23, 373-378.
29. Chaubey P.K. Singh R.P. (1994) Madras Agricultural Journal, 81, 438–470.
30. Ojo D.K., Omikunle O.A.,Ajala M.O. and Ogunbayo S.A. (2006) World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2, 352-358.