EVALUATION OF NANOCOMPOSITES PACKAGING CONTAINING ZnO ON SHELF LIFE OF FRESH NAGPUR MANDARIN (Citrus reticulata Blanco) JUICE

DINESH KUMAR1*, LALLAN RAM2, N. VIGNESHWARAN3
1ICAR- Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, 440033, Maharashtra, India
2Central Institute of Horticulture, Medziphema, 797106, Nagaland, India
3ICAR- Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology (CIRCOT), Matunga, Mumbai, 400019, Maharashtra, India
* Corresponding Author : dineshscn@gmail.com

Received : 17-05-2018     Accepted : 27-05-2018     Published : 30-05-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 10       Pages : 6116 - 6120
Int J Agr Sci 10.10 (2018):6116-6120

Keywords : ZnO embedded Nanopackaging, LDPE packaging, Zinc oxide nano particles, Nagpur mandarin, refrigerated storage, microbial stability
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to ICAR- Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, 440033, Maharashtra, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : KUMAR, DINESH, et al "EVALUATION OF NANOCOMPOSITES PACKAGING CONTAINING ZnO ON SHELF LIFE OF FRESH NAGPUR MANDARIN (Citrus reticulata Blanco) JUICE." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.10 (2018):6116-6120.

Cite - APA : KUMAR, DINESH, RAM, LALLAN, VIGNESHWARAN, N. (2018). EVALUATION OF NANOCOMPOSITES PACKAGING CONTAINING ZnO ON SHELF LIFE OF FRESH NAGPUR MANDARIN (Citrus reticulata Blanco) JUICE. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (10), 6116-6120.

Cite - Chicago : KUMAR, DINESH, LALLAN RAM, and N. VIGNESHWARAN. "EVALUATION OF NANOCOMPOSITES PACKAGING CONTAINING ZnO ON SHELF LIFE OF FRESH NAGPUR MANDARIN (Citrus reticulata Blanco) JUICE." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 10 (2018):6116-6120.

Copyright : © 2018, DINESH KUMAR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The ZnO Nanocomposites film used in study was characterized by 40nm ZnO nanoparticle embedded in 60 µm thickness poly film with tensile strength of 3.35±0.50 kg longitudinally and 1.67±0.27 kg transversely average breaking load which was provided by CIRCOT, Mumbai. Quality parameters like total soluble solid, acidity, browning index, color value, ascorbic acid content, limonin, carotenoids, sugars and microbial load of nanocomposites and LDPE film packed Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) juice stored in refrigerated condition were evaluated at monthly interval. Microbial load recorded as 6 log CFU/ml till 90 days of storage, which was considered as below threshold population in the nano packaging, contain ZnO as nano material. The juice orange color (a/b ratio) was found to be slightly better in ZnO nano packaging (0.33) as compared to LDPE packaging (0.22) after 30 days storage. The juice acidity dwindles from 0.59-0.73% and 0.81% in ZnO nano packaging and LDPE packaging respectively after 30 days storage. Further, least degradation of ascorbic acid (26.95mg/100ml) was observed in ZnO nano packaging. None of juice packaging showed browning upto 90 days storage. Increased trend in limonin and carotene content of juice was observed after 30 days of storage which decreased later in both type of packaging. However, juice reducing sugar in nano ZnO composed packaging maintained their value beyond 30 days in refrigerated storage. Total sugar and non-reducing sugar showed decreasing and afterwards decreasing trend both in nanopackaging and LDPE packaging.

References

1. Meléndez-Martínez A. J., Vicario I. M. and Heredia F. J. (2007) Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 20, 638−649.
2. Bull M. K., Zerdin K., Goicoechea D., Paramanandhan P., Stockman R. and Sellahewa J. (2004) Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 5, 135−149.
3. Souza M. C. C., Benassi M. T., Meneghel R. F. A. and Silva R. S. S. F. (2004) Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47(3), 391−397.
4. Baxter I.A., Easton K., Schneebeli K. and Whitfield F.B. (2005) Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 6, 372−387.
5. Elez-Martínez P., Soliva-Fortuny R. C. and Martín-Belloso O. (2006) European Food Research and Technology, 222, 321−329.
6. Foley D. M., Pickett K., Varon J., Lee J., Min D. B. and Caporaso F. (2002) Journal of Food Science, 67(4), 1495−1501.
7. Tran M. and Farid M. (2004) Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 5, 495−502.
8. Valero M., Recrosio N., Saura D., Muñoz N., Martí N. and Lizama V. (2007) Journal of Food Engineering, 80,509−516.
9. Han J. H. (2007) Packaging for nonthermally processed foods. In J. H. Han (Ed.), Packaging for nonthermal processing of food (pp. 213−225). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Chaudhry Q., Scotte M., Blackburn J., Ross B., Boxall A. and Castle L. (2008) Food Additives and Contaminants, 25(3), 241−258.
11. Joseph T. and Morrison M. (2006) Nanotechnology in agriculture and food. In: Nanoforum report www.nanoforum.org, 14.
12. Damm C., Neumann M. and Münstedt H. (2006) Soft Materials, 3(2), 71−88.
13. Yan D., Yin G., Huang Z., Yang M., Liao X. and Kang Y. (2009) The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 113, 6047−6053.
14. Jones N., Ray B., Ranjit K. T. and Manna A. C. (2008) FEMS Microbiology Letters, 279, 71−76.
15. Jin T., Sun D., Su J. Y., Zhang H. and Sue H. J. (2009) Journal of Food Science, 74(1), 46−52.
16. Vigneshwaran N., Bharimalla A.K., Prasad V., Kathe A.A. and Balasubramanya R.H. (2008) J. Nanosci. Nanotech, 8(7), 1-6.
17. Emamifar A., Kadivar M., Shahedi M. and Zad S. S. (2011) Food Control, 22, 408-413.
18. AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Analytical Chemists, 15th Ed. Washington DC.
19. Meydav S., Saguy I. and Kopelman I. J. (1977) Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 25(3), 602−604.
20. Wilson K.W and Cruthchfield C.A. (1968) J. Agr. Food Chem, 16, 118-124.
21. Ting S.V. Russell and Rouseff L. (1986) Analysis and Technology, Florida Markel Deccar, Inc. ACC-6.
22. Miller G.L. (1972) Annals of Chemistry, 31, 426-428
23. Ranganna S. (1986) Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products, Second edition, pp. 623.
24. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967) Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. 2nd edn. ICAR. New Delhi.
25. Cortés C., Esteve M. J. and Frígola A. (2008) Food Control, 19, 151−158.
26. Adams L. K., Lyon D. Y. and Alvarez P. J. J. (2006) Water Research, 40(19), 3527−3532.
27. Sawai J. and Yoshikawa T. (2004) Journal of Applied Microbiology, 96, 803−809.
28. Gajjar P., Pettee B., Britt D. W., Huang W., Johnson W. and Anderson A. J. (2009) Journal of Biological Engineering, 3(9), 1183−1189.
29. Plaza L., Sánchez-Moreno C., Elez-Martínez P., De Ancos B., Martín-Belloso O. and Cano M.P. (2006) European Food Research and Technology, 223 (4), 487-493.
30. Sadler G. D., Parish M. E. and Wicker L. (1992) Journal of Food Science, 57 (5), 1187-1192.
31. Leizerson S. and Shimoni E. (2005) Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 53, 4012−4018.
32. Koca N., Burdurlu H. S. and Karadeniz F. (2003) Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27, 353−360.
33. Ram L. and Singh S. (2008) Development of mosambi juice powder, processing, value addition and waste utilization in citrus fruits, Technical bulletin 22. NRCC, Nagpur, 32-33.
34. Haugaard V. K., Weber C. J., Danielsen B. and Bertelsen G. (2002) European Food Research and Technology, 214, 423−428.
35. Raccach M. M. and Mellatdoust M. (2007) Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 31, 129−142.
36. Emamifar A., Kadivar M., Shahedi M. and Zad S. S. (2010) Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 11, 742-748.