DIKSHA PATEL1*, M.C.A. DEVI2, A.J. DHODIA3, SUJATA PARMAR4, J. PARAMESWARANAIK5
1Dairy Extension Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, India
2Dairy Extension Section, SRS of ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Bangalore- 560030, India
3Extension Education Department, N M College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari-396450, India
4Department of Extension Education, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, 362001, India
5Dairy Extension Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, India
* Corresponding Author : pateldiksha279@gmail.com
Received : 10-04-2016 Accepted : 22-04-2016 Published : 21-07-2016
Volume : 8 Issue : 25 Pages : 1492 - 1495
Int J Agr Sci 8.25 (2016):1492-1495
Keywords : Role performance, Field extension functionaries, Veterinary services, Dairy technology, Feedback
Academic Editor : P.R. Kanani
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : The authors are thankful to Director ICAR-NDRI, Karnal and Head of SRS of ICAR-NDRI, Bengaluru for providing necessary facilities. The authors are also thankful to the all Field extension functionaries of DAH&VS and KMF for their sincere response
Author Contribution : None declared
The present study was conducted during 2014-15 to study the role performance of field extension functionaries of Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services (DAH&VS) and Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF). An ex-post facto research design was employed for the study. The study was restricted to 120 field extension functionaries (FEFs) of DAH&VS and KMF, selected from 2 districts i.e., Bangalore Rural and Bangalore Urban districts of Karnataka state. Data collection was done by using the questionnaire method. Majority of the respondents (62.50%) were in medium level of role performance category followed by 20.00 per cent and 17.50 per cent were in low and high level of role performance categories respectively. The areas wise activity role performance shows that, the other activities were the most prioritized activity with weighted mean score (42.67) followed by veterinary services (40.88) followed by extension services (39.00) respectively. The result shows that extension services were the third most prioritize activity of FEFs in their job activities. This is the main concern for both the department, so the policy makers of both departments should create an exclusive unit of some extension personnel who were only concern with livestock education services, transfer of dairy technology, level of adoption, their consequences and feedback from farmers.