Response of Canola (Brassica napus L.) to Biofertilizers under Egyptian conditions in newly reclaimed soil

Salem A. Mahfouz¹*, Ekram A. Megawer^2
1Microbiology Department, Fac. Agric. Fayoum, Egypt
²Agronomy Dept., Fac. Agric. Fayoum, Egypt
* Corresponding Author : salmahfouze@yahoo.com

Received : -     Accepted : -     Published : 15-06-2010
Volume : 2     Issue : 1       Pages : 12 - 17
Int J Agr Sci 2.1 (2010):12-17
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.2.1.12-17

The study was conducted in the farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Demo, Fayoum, Egypt. The soil was of loamy- sand type. During 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 season, using a split plot arrangement in randomized complete block design with three replicates, the work was done to determine the effect of adding biofertilizers (Azotobacter + Azospirillum, free nitrogen fixers and Trichoderma a phosphate solubilizing fungi) in combinations with mineral N fertilizer with either recommended dose (N1) or half of this dose (N2) on yield quantity and quality of two canola lines (L6 and H2). The results revealed that the two canola lines were significantly different in plant height, number of branches, number of pods and seed yield /plant. L6 surpassed H2 line for previous traits, in addition to insignificantly higher values of the other traits; T10, T11 and T12 showed superiority and high productivity with saving half of the mineral N recommended dose. For interaction; H2T10, was the best in all traits except for plant height, protein and oil percentages. H2T4, L6T6 and L6T8, for all traits except for seed index and oil percentage. The highest productivity recoded by H2T10 (N2+Trichoderma +Azotobacter), H2T11 (N2 + Azotobacter+ Azospirllum) and L6T8 (N2+ Azotobacter) which outyielded their corresponding control by 39.3, 31.8 and 23.0% a result of using only 50% of the recommended dose of N-fertilizer (N2). The latter combination was also superior in protein content (26.5%). These three combinations could be recommended as alternative method for canola fertilization, where they had economic and safely advantages.

[1] Bunt, J.S. and Rovira, A.D. (1955). Microbiological studies of some Antarctic soils. J. Soil Sci., 6: 199-228  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[2] Cecilia, M.C., Sueldo, R.J. and Barassi, C.A. (2004). Water relations and yield in Azosprillum – inoculated wheatexposed to drought in field. Can. J. Bot., 82: 373-281.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[3] Day, J.M. and Dobereiner, J. (1975). Physiological aspects of N2-fixation by Azospirillum from Digitaria roots. Soil Biol. Biochem., 8: 45-50  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[4] Ebrahimi, S., Naehad, H. I., Shirani Rad, A.H., Abbas Akbari, G. Amiry, R. and Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M. (2007). Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum application on quantity and quality forage of rapeseed cultivars. Pak. J, Bio. Sci., 10(18): 3126-3130  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[5] Freitas, J. R., Banerjee, M. R. and Germida, J. J. (1997). Phosphate solubilizing Rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol. Fert. Soil, 24: 358-364  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[6] Ghallab, K.H. and Sharaan, A.N. (2002). Selection in canola (Brassica napus L.) germplasm under conditions of newly reclaimed land. II. Salt tolerant selections. Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 6(2): 15-30.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[7] Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[8] Grami,B. and La Croix, L.J. (1977). Cultivar variation in total nitrogen uptake in rape, Can. J. Plant Sci. 57 (1977): 619–624.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[9] Gupta, A.K. and Samnotra, R.K. (2004). Effect of biofertilizers and nitrogen on growth, quality and yield of cabbage (Brassica napus). Environ. Ecol., 22: 551-553  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[10] Hegazi, N.A., Amer, H.A. and Monib, M. (1980). Studies on N2-fixing Spirilla (Azospirillum spp.) in Egyptian soils. Rev. Ecol. Biol. soil, 17: 491-499,  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[11] Kandil, A.A. (1984). Preliminary study on the effect of NPK fertilization on the oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Res. Bull. No. 429, Fac. of Agric. Zagazig University  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[12] Khalid, A., Rashad, M. A. and Zahir, Z. A. (2004). Screening plant growth – promoting Rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J. Applied Microbiol., 96: 473-480  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[13] Ozturk, A., Caglar, O. and Sahin, F. (2003). Yield response of wheat and barley to inoculation of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria at various levels of nitrogen fertilizers. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.,166: 262-266  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[14] Prasad, M. and Prasad, R. (2004). Effect of mepiquat chloride, Azotobacter and nitrogen on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and their residual effect on succeeding transplanted Indianmustard Brassica juncea. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 74: 273-275  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[15] Rodriguez, H., Gonzales, T., Goir, I. and Bashan, Y. (2004). Gluconic acid production and phosphate solubilization by the plant growthpromoting bacterium Azospirillum spp. Naturwissensechaften, 91: 552-555  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[16] Sharaan, A.N. (1986). Variation in character expression in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars in relation to environmental changes. Bull. Fac. of Agric. Univ. of Cairo 37 (1): 35-48.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[17] Sharaan, A. N., Ghallab, K. H. and Yousif, K. M. (2002). Performance and water relations of some rapeseed genotypes grown in sandy loam soils under irrigation regimes. Annals of Agric. Sc., Moshtohor, 40(2): 751-767  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[18] Sharma, S. K., Rao, R. M. and Singh, D. P. (1997). Effect of crop geometry and nitrogen on quality and oil yield of Brassica species. Ind. J. Agron., 42: 357-360  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[19] Singh, M. M., Mautya, M. L. , Singh, S. P. and Mishra, C. H. (2005). Effect of nitrogen and biofertilizers inoculation on productivity of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 73: 167-168.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[20] Suneja, S. and Lakshminaraya, K. (2001). Isolation of siderophore negative mutants of Azotobacter chroococcum and studied on the role of siderophores in mustard yield. Ind. J. Plant Physiol., 6: 190-193  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[21] Weiss, E.W. (1983). Oilseed Crops. Longman, London & New York. pp. 660.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[22] Yasari, E., Esmaeli Azadgoleh, A. M. , Pirdashti, H. and Mozafari, S. (2008). Azotobacter and Azospirllum inoculants as biofertilizers in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivation. Asian J. Plant Sci., 7(5): 490-494.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[23] Yasari, E., Azadgoleh, M. A. E., Mozafari, S. and Alashti, M.R. (2009). Enhancement of growth and nutrient uptake of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by applying mineral nutrients and biofertilzers. Pak. J, Bio. Sci., 12(2): 127-133  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus